Page 2
I think that show was also very educational. I know I learned a lot from
watching it since I really don't recall much about the war while it was
going on. It surely has made me see it in a new perspective and I have a
lot of respect for all Vietnam vets from watching it. It think it will
have
the same effect on a lot of people.
I also heard that the US Army was not particularly happy with the third
season, because of some of the content in the shows about the SOG, and
that
was another reason for its cancellation.
How do the actors learn and remember all those
lines.
How was Tour of Duty developed?
How accurate was ToD?
From little I have read about TOD it seems that the ratings were low
and
that is the reason it was canceled. I can't believe that. I loved the
show then & still do as do many many other fans.
TOD ran into the economics of commercial television. As you know, television
works by selling air time to sponsors to advertise their products. For a show
to succeed it must be watched by a LOT of people. Not only that, but they
have to be the RIGHT people too, the demographics kick in here. The audience
the sponsors want to reach is in their early 20's to mid '40's, and must be
both male and female. TOD had a reasonable audience, but it was
overwhelmingly male. This is not good. There is an axiom that female viewers
won't watch a show without strong female characters, and TOD spent a lot of
the first and second season trying to introduce them. The problem THERE was
that TOD was about an infantry unit, an all-male group whose job was to go
out and kill people. In the 1988-89 season "China Beach" debuted on another
network. It was also set in Vietnam, but it was about a military hospital
with nurses and USO performers and Red Cross girls and its ratings with women
were great. They also weren't there to kill people, but to help save them,
which went down better with the viewing audience.
TOD's other problem was its timeslot. At the time CBS was dead last in the
ratings. They had high hopes for TOD, and threw it up against "The Cosby
Show". The Cosby Show was a true television classic, starring a comic genius
and appealing to all races, genders and age groups. Even the TOD's
"founders", Steve Duncan and L. Travis Clark could
never bring themselves to urge viewers to watch TOD instead. We never came
close to beating Cosby, although we did okay against some of his reruns. (The
third network competitor was "The Father Dowling Mysteries" which mostly
appealed to older viewers. It was no threat to us.
Thereafter the show had its time period switched around several times. This
isn't good, since it confuses viewers and usually costs you your core
audience. This also hurt us.
On the other hand, TOD's rating were never high enough to normally justify
renewal, but CBS was losing the ratings game anyway. TOD was a critically
acclaimed show
and it didn't hurt CBS to keep it on as a showpiece
The show was very controversial when it came out, mostly because it showed
the soldiers in a good light! Up until the dedication of the Vietnam Memorial
in 1982, the "popular culture" image of the Vietnam veteran was of a drug
addict/baby killer who had been beaten by some rice farmers. When the show
came out, TIME Magazine was bemused (I want to say "annoyed") that it showed
military commanders who actually cared about their soldiers' survival.
No. Not true. The Army had canceled its active assistance before the second
season began, largely because of all the negative scripts. (The actors
themselves called it the "Psycho of the Week" season.) The Army wasn't
actually being unfair. They were willing to support a show with a negative
theme, drug use, perhaps, but they wanted a counter theme that this was
against Army policy, and see the culprit brought to justice by the System, so
to speak, by the end of the show. Of course "The System Working" isn't a very
dramatic concept, so......
Actually the Army had only stopped ACTIVE participation at the end of the
first season. Active participation was allowing the use of its aircraft,
artillery pieces, etc, the use of military personnel, and filming on military
bases. (The show was allowed to sort of "rent" the equipment, pay fuel costs
etc, and "hire" the personnel as extras. The Army wasn't out any money.
However, right to the end, the Army' continued to advise the show. Their
Public Affairs Office in Hollywood got the scripts with all the changes,
reviewed them, made suggestions and assisted with information. I used to
speak with the PAO people almost every day and we would discuss upcoming
episodes and what we might do with them. I mostly agreed with them, but I
felt I was the intermediary between the Army's desire to present themselves
in the best light and the dramatic demands of a TV show. I'm sure my third
season replacement, my friend MAJ Mike Christie, felt the same.
One thing that the Army was VERY concerned about, and TOD too, in a different
degree, was in NOT showing veterans in a bad light. There had been too much
of that in the past. The same went for the South Vietnamese armed forces, who
are generally shown in a favorable fashion.
That is THEIR job! LOL. TOD was VERY hard on the actors, especially the
"principles" who got up very early each morning for transportation to the
set, makeup, and then doing physically demanding scenes over and over again.
The episodes were not shot sequentially, but "by location". Then back to
their hotel for a quick dinner, then learn the next days lines, which had
changed overnight, then go to sleep and do the whole thing over again the
next day.
To start
with, it was, "sort of", based on the 1960's TV Show "Combat", except that
the character of "Zeke Anderson" was based on "Master Sergeant Clell Hazard"
from the movie "Gardens of Stone". We reduced his age, rank and worldly
experience but, like Hazard, Zeke had served before in Vietnam (two tours)
and looks forward to becoming a fishing guide in the Pacific Northwest. If
you haven't seen "Gardens of Stone" I recommend it highly, and the book it
was based on, more. (More on this later)
Well, let's say it was "television accurate" A lot of things couldn't be
shown or dealt with. Not only were there obvious restrictions on violence and
profanity, but other matters too. For example, after their exposure to
combat, soldiers soon learn ways to inure themselves to the death and
violence around them. A cynical, even malicious sense of humor is one minor
way, but this would be too shocking to a general audience. Callousness also
came with the job, but ToD soldiers never show this. They are always ready to
stop the battle to mourn a fallen comrade or help an innocent civilian, just
as our viewers would want them to do. Soldiers in Vietnam also used a
particular slang, with Vietnamese words and period expressions, but the
writers felt it would be too hard for the casual viewer to pick up. But
beyond even those issues there were basic problems with how the show was
written. As anyone knows, who has been in the military, officers like Goldman
give the orders and sergeants like Anderson see they are carried out. ToD let
Anderson give most of the orders himself. After working with the Army set
advisors for awhile, I heard that Stephen Caffrey realized this and was
reportedly frustrated that he wasn't allowed to command the unit the right
way. Then there was all this stuff about disobeying orders. You won't have
much of a military career doing that. The most a good leader can do is to
intercede for his people, and try to prevent their lives from being wasted
stupidly. Finally, on a very minor note, but one that made me very nervous
(as I was there for accuracy), a LOT of liberties were taken with the history
of the war and the 196th Light Infantry Brigade, and with the physical
geography of Vietnam.